I took the text from the plan and
poured it into the Wordle engine and this is what I got.
Interesting how you get all the
important words for education: students; teachers; education; and
learning. All the words you would expect when talking about a plan
for BC's education system. These words don't really reflect the whole
story in this plan. On page 4 of the plan, the strengths that will be
built upon in the BC system are identified as:
- Staying solid on the basics
- More real-world skills
- Improved student assessment and reporting
- Importance of teachers
- Effective teaching
- Greater flexibility
- Freedom to adapt
Now looking at the word cloud graphic
above, I don't get a sense of these areas the government is
suggesting we move our system, sometimes with legislation if
necessary. And let's not miss this signal. legislation means there's
a political will to make this happen.
In an attempt to get a better sense of
the document, I took out the top 10 words in the word cloud. This
included students, teachers, education and learning plus a few more. Dumping the text back into the Wordle engine, you
get a very different view.
I will allow you to interpret this
image how you wish, but for me the message is we're not clear on
where we're where going. The multitude of words about the same size
seems to indicate there are a lot of competing priorities for what is
important. I think the contributors of this plan understood this
issue and attempted to provide some clarity by identifying a response
or action steps to this challenge. The plan identifies five key
elements to creating a flexible, adaptable and excellent education
system for BC. These elements are:
- Personalized learning for every student
- Quality teaching and learning
- Flexibility and choice
- High standards
- Learning empowered by technology
All great stuff, but I don't see it in
the graphic and I don't see it in the plan.
20 years ago when the government of the
day developed the Year 2000 plan in response the Sullivan Royal
Commission on Education a lot of resources were brought to bear on
creating a system for the 21st century. That plan, which
used very similar language to this plan, was thrown out and replaced
with a vigourous, underfunded curriculum revision process. A process
which was needed because we spent so much time talking about what
could 'be' rather than what 'is' and what can we afford.
As we move forward, let's take the
those words in the Wordle, identify which are key to us and make sure
we can afford to implement and sustain them. From there we can take
the vision from the plan and laser focus our efforts into making real
change that improves our education system for all British Columbians.